T1's Blue Side Strategy: A Strategic Evolution in the 2024 World Finals

The landscape of professional League of Legends has always been shaped by strategic choices, and T1’s decision to select blue side in their World Championship finals against BLG (Bilibili Gaming) represents a fascinating tactical evolution.

Strategic Implications:

• Historical Context T1’s tournament performance shows a remarkable record on both sides - they remain undefeated on blue side while only losing twice on red side against TES and GEN. This track record makes their blue side preference particularly intriguing, as it deviates from their previous tournament approach where they predominantly played on red side.

• Ban Phase Dynamics The blue side selection fundamentally alters the ban phase dynamics. BLG now faces a critical decision regarding priority bans on champions like Ahri and Aatrox. This creates a strategic dilemma - banning both leaves other powerful picks open, while leaving either available risks T1’s counterpick potential.

• Pick Priority Shifts T1’s first pick advantage on blue side opens up new possibilities:

1. Securing priority picks like K’Sante or Xayah
2. Denying BLG’s comfort champions
3. Enabling more flexible counter-picking in later phases

Team Composition Impact: T1’s drafting preferences have shown a clear evolution throughout the tournament. Their blue side strategy typically involves:

• Early priority on flex picks
• Strong emphasis on mid-game teamfighting compositions
• Increased focus on support counterpicks for Keria

The Support Factor: Keria’s champion pool plays a crucial role in T1’s strategic approach. His performances on champions like Renata Glasc have been particularly impactful, maintaining a 100% win rate in the tournament. This suggests T1 might prioritize support counterpicks over traditional top lane priority.

Meta Considerations: The current meta heavily favors strong early game pressure and objective control - areas where T1 has excelled throughout the tournament. Their blue side preference indicates confidence in:

• Securing priority picks that align with the current meta
• Maintaining control over neutral objectives
• Executing early game pressure strategies

Looking at both teams' strengths, this strategic choice creates an intriguing tactical battle. BLG’s adaptability and deep champion pools will be tested against T1’s methodical approach to blue side advantages. The success of this strategy may well determine the outcome of this highly anticipated China vs South Korea finals matchup.